HeartLab
Measurements

Accuracy and Limitations

Clinical and technical factors that influence measurement accuracy in HeartLab.

Accuracy and Limitations

HeartLab provides tools for performing measurements on medical images received from external systems (for example imaging modalities or vendor-neutral archives). The accuracy of these measurements depends on multiple clinical and technical factors, including image quality, display conditions, and user interaction.

Measurement quality is not determined solely by the software. It is influenced by image acquisition, image visualisation, and operator technique. Final clinical interpretation and reporting always remain the responsibility of the reporting clinician.

Key Factors Affecting Measurement Accuracy

1. Image Quality

Measurement accuracy begins with the quality of the source image. Factors that may influence image quality include:

  • Patient positioning and fixation
  • Patient or organ motion
  • Imaging modality and acquisition protocol
  • Reconstruction artefacts or distortions
  • Spatial and contrast resolution

High-quality image acquisition is essential for reliable measurements. Poor image quality directly reduces measurement precision and diagnostic confidence.

2. Display and Viewing Conditions

The way images are displayed in HeartLab affects how accurately anatomy can be interpreted and measured.

Important display settings include:

  • Zoom level
  • Grey level and contrast
  • Window width and level
  • Screen resolution

These settings influence how clearly anatomical boundaries are visualised and how precisely measurement points can be placed.

3. Operator Interaction and Point Placement

The most significant factor affecting measurement accuracy is the user’s ability to correctly place points or contours.

  • Measurements rely on manual placement of points on anatomical structures
  • Accuracy depends on how precisely the cursor is positioned
  • Clear identification of anatomical boundaries is essential

Users must determine whether the selected points accurately represent the intended anatomy.

Technical Accuracy Considerations

Cursor Positioning and Pixel Resolution

Cursor placement is limited by the physical resolution of the display.

  • The cursor can only be positioned at the level of screen pixels
  • This introduces a positioning uncertainty of approximately ± half a screen pixel

If the screen pixel size is δ mm, the positional uncertainty is approximately:

± 0.5 × δ mm

Impact of Zoom

Zoom level directly affects measurement precision.

  • Zooming in improves precision by reducing relative positioning uncertainty
  • Zooming out increases uncertainty because cursor movement becomes less precise relative to image detail

For best results, images should be zoomed so that image pixels appear larger than screen pixels, allowing more precise point placement.

Measurement and Error Propagation

All measurements (distance, area, volume, and derived calculations) are calculated from user-placed points. Any uncertainty in point placement propagates into calculated values.

Examples of affected measurements include:

  • Distance
  • Angle
  • Area
  • Volume
  • Derived calculations (for example ejection fraction)
The accuracy of derived measurements depends directly on the accuracy of the original point placement.

Practical Guidance for Clinicians

To improve measurement accuracy in daily practice:

  • Use the highest-quality image or frame available
  • Zoom in before placing critical measurement points
  • Ensure anatomical borders are clearly visible before tracing
  • Verify contours across multiple frames where appropriate
  • Repeat measurements if image quality or border definition is poor
  • Document any limitations when image quality affects diagnostic confidence

Interpretation and Responsibility

HeartLab provides measurement tools and calculated values based on user input. However:

  • Measurements depend on image quality and operator technique
  • Technical limitations (such as pixel resolution and zoom level) influence precision
  • Clinical interpretation and final reporting remain the responsibility of the clinician
MFR
Manufacturer
HeartLab Limited 305 / 150 Karangahape Road Auckland 1010 New Zealand
UK REP
UK Responsible Person
Casus UKRP Ltd 107-111 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AB United Kingdom
AUS
Australian Sponsor
Emergo Australia Level 20 Tower II Darling Park 201 Sussex Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
MD Applies to HeartLab v7.2 and above Effective 0000-00-00 eIFU version 0.0.0 UDI-DI 09421907090023